From 362d4f0cd4e50111edfae9d30c90602c37ed65a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 19:18:35 +0200
Subject: Explicitly mark overriding destructors as "virtual"

It appears that the C++ standard allows overriding destructors to be marked
"override," but at least some MSVC versions complain about it, so at least make
sure such destructors are explicitly marked "virtual."

Change-Id: I0e1cafa7584fd16ebdce61f569eae2373a71b0a1
---
 stoc/source/namingservice/namingservice.cxx | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'stoc/source/namingservice')

diff --git a/stoc/source/namingservice/namingservice.cxx b/stoc/source/namingservice/namingservice.cxx
index a4cb8f36e8e1..016bb9a27a57 100644
--- a/stoc/source/namingservice/namingservice.cxx
+++ b/stoc/source/namingservice/namingservice.cxx
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ class NamingService_Impl
     HashMap_OWString_Interface          aMap;
 public:
     NamingService_Impl();
-    ~NamingService_Impl();
+    virtual ~NamingService_Impl();
 
     // XServiceInfo
     virtual OUString SAL_CALL getImplementationName()
-- 
cgit