From 6e8acc24eb8eb5f91e2db5e11457bb44e2b19f23 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tor Lillqvist Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 18:48:40 +0200 Subject: Some compilers need explicit OUString() in return expression Change-Id: Ideb64a7cf6fd4ad563b0e4bfab5583af1ecefd54 --- sc/source/core/tool/calcconfig.cxx | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'sc') diff --git a/sc/source/core/tool/calcconfig.cxx b/sc/source/core/tool/calcconfig.cxx index ab6855e61f38..f1524089767f 100644 --- a/sc/source/core/tool/calcconfig.cxx +++ b/sc/source/core/tool/calcconfig.cxx @@ -105,10 +105,10 @@ OUString StringConversionToString(ScCalcConfig::StringConversion eConv) { switch (eConv) { - case ScCalcConfig::StringConversion::ILLEGAL: return "ILLEGAL"; - case ScCalcConfig::StringConversion::ZERO: return "ZERO"; - case ScCalcConfig::StringConversion::UNAMBIGUOUS: return "UNAMBIGUOUS"; - case ScCalcConfig::StringConversion::LOCALE: return "LOCALE"; + case ScCalcConfig::StringConversion::ILLEGAL: return OUString("ILLEGAL"); + case ScCalcConfig::StringConversion::ZERO: return OUString("ZERO"); + case ScCalcConfig::StringConversion::UNAMBIGUOUS: return OUString("UNAMBIGUOUS"); + case ScCalcConfig::StringConversion::LOCALE: return OUString("LOCALE"); default: return OUString::number((int) eConv); } } -- cgit