From 37a3f9638315483114380a461f60abeab7809a3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:43:39 +0100
Subject: WaE: assuming signed overflow does not occur when assuming...

that (X + c) < X is always false [-Wstrict-overflow]

Change-Id: I63880bf27ab7e34eb9e0be682b39b80b71d65103
---
 basebmp/source/bitmapdevice.cxx | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'basebmp')

diff --git a/basebmp/source/bitmapdevice.cxx b/basebmp/source/bitmapdevice.cxx
index fb08e322ea62..00fc1c21951c 100644
--- a/basebmp/source/bitmapdevice.cxx
+++ b/basebmp/source/bitmapdevice.cxx
@@ -339,8 +339,15 @@ namespace
         {
             if( !mpDamage )
                 return;
-            basegfx::B2IPoint aEnd( rDamagePoint.getX() + 1,
-                                    rDamagePoint.getY() + 1 );
+
+            sal_Int32 nX(rDamagePoint.getX());
+            sal_Int32 nY(rDamagePoint.getY());
+            if (nX < SAL_MAX_INT32)
+                ++nX;
+            if (nY < SAL_MAX_INT32)
+                ++nY;
+
+            basegfx::B2IPoint aEnd( nX, nY );
             damaged( basegfx::B2IBox( rDamagePoint, aEnd ) );
         }
 
-- 
cgit